Products

When the product fails

Manufacturers, distributors, and sellers in South Africa can be responsible when a defective product causes harm.

In South Africa, product liability is the responsibility of parties involved in designing, making, importing, distributing, or selling goods when those goods cause harm. That can include a component manufacturer, the assembler, a dealer, or the retailer that sold the item to a consumer.

The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 imposes strict liability for harm caused by unsafe goods, product failure, or inadequate instructions or warnings. Claims may also rest on the common law of delict. Many cases begin as individual injury claims and later reveal a broader pattern that put customers at risk.

Where more than one party is to blame, the Apportionment of Damages Act may reduce or share liability. Civil trials in South Africa are heard by a judge, not a jury.

Claim Types

Types of defective-product claims

Manufacturing defects

The product was made incorrectly — an error at the factory that made this item different from others on the shelf, and that difference caused the injury.

  • A toxin present as an impurity in medicine
  • A vehicle missing headlights after assembly
  • A cracked chain on a swing

Design defects

The design itself is unreasonably dangerous. The injury-causing item may have been built exactly to spec, but the entire product line is harmful.

  • Tires that separate at high speeds because of cheaper materials
  • A line of heated blankets that can electrocute users on high
  • Sunglasses that fail to protect eyes from ultraviolet rays

Failure to warn

The manufacturer did not give adequate warnings or instructions about correct use, especially where the danger is not obvious or special precautions are required.

  • Medicine without a warning about dangerous drug combinations
  • An appliance packaged without caution about a hazardous switch or vent
  • A harsh chemical sold without instructions for safe use and storage

Telling the claim types apart

A bottle of cough syrup illustrates the difference. If arsenic dropped into that bottle during manufacturing, the claim is a manufacturing defect. If the intended formula itself caused a stroke or heart attack, the claim is a design defect. If the product was made properly and is generally safe, but it harmed you because it was combined with another medicine and the label did not warn of that danger, the claim is failure to warn.

Tell us what happened.

A short note is enough to start. We review new matters promptly and reply ourselves.

Start a conversation
WhatsApp us